An empirical analysis: practices of Italian courts on dual preliminarity (2018-2022). A mixed response ORLANDO SCARCELLO TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction Context: Shaping the 269-Doctrine Methodology Results Notable Cases Conclusion Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostEditorial. New threats to Academic freedom Next PostDual preliminarity in comparative law You Might Also Like THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: ETHICS AND EFFICIENCY March 14, 2024 TRANSPARENCY WITHIN THE ARTIFICIAL ADMINISTRATION PRINCIPLES, PATHS, PERSPECTIVES AND PROBLEMS March 14, 2024 METHOD IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY BETWEEN NATURE AND ARTEFACT March 14, 2024
TRANSPARENCY WITHIN THE ARTIFICIAL ADMINISTRATION PRINCIPLES, PATHS, PERSPECTIVES AND PROBLEMS March 14, 2024