An empirical analysis: practices of Italian courts on dual preliminarity (2018-2022). A mixed response ORLANDO SCARCELLO TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction Context: Shaping the 269-Doctrine Methodology Results Notable Cases Conclusion Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostEditorial. New threats to Academic freedom Next PostDual preliminarity in comparative law You Might Also Like Dual preliminarity, today. Evaluating the impact of judgment no. 269/2017 of the Italian Constitutional Court Judgment no. 269/2017 and dual preliminarity in the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Italian constitutional court The «dual preliminarity» doctrine in the case law of ordinary courts of first instance and appeals
Dual preliminarity, today. Evaluating the impact of judgment no. 269/2017 of the Italian Constitutional Court
Judgment no. 269/2017 and dual preliminarity in the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Italian constitutional court
