An empirical analysis: practices of Italian courts on dual preliminarity (2018-2022). A mixed response ORLANDO SCARCELLO TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction Context: Shaping the 269-Doctrine Methodology Results Notable Cases Conclusion Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostEditorial. New threats to Academic freedom Next PostDual preliminarity in comparative law You Might Also Like EDITORIAL – JUST SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION IN THE AGE OF EXPERIMENTALISM AND IMPACT December 23, 2025 FROM GAP TO OPPORTUNITY: REGULATORY VOIDS AS SPACES FOR EXPERIMENTATION AND INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY December 23, 2025 LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ENABLING NOT FOR PROFIT AND DECENTRALISED RENEWABLE ENERGY COMMUNITIES. CASES FROM THE EU & ECOWAS December 23, 2025
FROM GAP TO OPPORTUNITY: REGULATORY VOIDS AS SPACES FOR EXPERIMENTATION AND INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY December 23, 2025
LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ENABLING NOT FOR PROFIT AND DECENTRALISED RENEWABLE ENERGY COMMUNITIES. CASES FROM THE EU & ECOWAS December 23, 2025