The Italian court of Cassation and dual preliminary DILETTA TEGA TABLE OF CONTENTS1. The Court of Cassation faced with the clarification of 2017 2. Acceptance of the clarification 3. Refusal of the clarification 4. Conclusion Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostThe ECJ’s approach to dual preliminarity 5 years after the ITCC’s judgment no. 269/2017 Next PostThe doctrine of dual preliminarity in the case law of Italian administrative courts You Might Also Like THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE January 7, 2026 THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: AN OVERVIEW January 7, 2026 THE DIFFICULT ROAD TO THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION. DILEMMAS AND STRENGTHS IN THE REGULATION OF AI BY THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE January 7, 2026
THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE January 7, 2026
THE DIFFICULT ROAD TO THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION. DILEMMAS AND STRENGTHS IN THE REGULATION OF AI BY THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE January 7, 2026