The «dual preliminarity» doctrine in the case law of ordinary courts of first instance and appeals MICHELE MASSA TABLE OF CONTENTS1. Premises and questions 2. Answers: summary and examples 3. Comments3.1. The new doctrine in action 3.2. Ordinary courts trust the ItCC 3.3. Cursory uses of the Charter must be avoided 3.4. A certain degree of ambiguity lingers 3.5 One aspect requires further clarification Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostThe doctrine of dual preliminarity in the case law of Italian administrative courts Next PostJudgment no. 269/2017 and dual preliminarity in the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Italian constitutional court You Might Also Like THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE January 7, 2026 THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: AN OVERVIEW January 7, 2026 THE DIFFICULT ROAD TO THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION. DILEMMAS AND STRENGTHS IN THE REGULATION OF AI BY THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE January 7, 2026
THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE January 7, 2026
THE DIFFICULT ROAD TO THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION. DILEMMAS AND STRENGTHS IN THE REGULATION OF AI BY THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE January 7, 2026